Monday, January 14, 2008

Telling the BBC to go f**k itself proving to be contagious...

Back in 2006 a film about the 7/7 bombings called Ludicrous Diversion was published on the Internet.

I had a few personal quibbles with the film but nothing major. I consider it to be the best film to date explaining why people should mistrust the Official Narrative of that day...




And it comes as excellent news to discover that the producers of
Ludicrous Diversion have, like the July 7th Truth group, told the BBC why they won't be participating in its Conspiracy Files documentary/ hit piece on (Unofficial) July 7th Conspiracy Theories. Their response, along with an email from the BBC, are available on the J7T blog but I'm reproducing it here because it pleases me so...


Dear Susan

Thanks for your invitation to come and discuss the 'conspiracy' issues surrounding 7/7. Unfortunately we must decline. The BBC's credibility amongst so-called 'conspiracy folk' is so non-existent that it's laughable. If you don't know why this is, check out youtube regarding the BBC and 911.

So you intend to find the definitive account of 7/7 – why wait until now? The BBC not only never questioned a single fact within the 'Official Story', but was itself responsible for disseminating the information without giving most of it even the most cursory investigative glance.

We draw your attention, for example, to the issue of what train the supposed bombers took into London. For well over a year the BBC continued to publish on its website the time given by the police and offered in the official investigation – despite the fact that particular train was cancelled - and this fact was widely available across the internet. The BBC only changed its story when the official story was itself changed and the train time altered. Worth thinking about. . .

In fact, in matters such as 7/7, i.e. matters of crucial importance to the British public, the evidence strongly indicates that the BBC is nothing more than a mouthpiece for the British government and intelligence agencies, relying on its historical reputation to create in the public mind exactly the picture that these bodies would like the public to see.

You, no doubt, will claim that you are coming at it afresh, with independent eyes. In that case, (after suggesting you wake up and smell the coffee) we think you should really dedicate the entire program not to the validity of the 7/7 `conspiracy theories`, but to an proper examination of the central conspiracy - how a web of lies was presented by the government, police and intelligence agencies and then disseminated without question by the mainstream media, your good selves at the BBC included.

The idea of the BBC presenting any sort of unbiased presentation would be comedic if it was not so tragically absurd. Their 'conspiracy series analysis of 911 was criminally negligent in its presentation of the facts and lapdog acceptance of the official story and will be correctly adjudged so in time. Your latest hitpiece on 7/7 'conspiracies' will sadly, but inevitably, be cut from the same branch.

You will 'consider' a few of the enormous number of lines of investigation, a blend of the most easily dismissed and the most obviously insane. You will do exactly no independent investigation of any kind. And your conclusion will be that most of the questions being posed by 'conspiracy theorists' regarding 7/7 are without any real basis, but some questions do need asking about the role of the intelligence agencies in following the four men before the event. How do we know this will be your conclusion? Because that is the official line. Feel free to prove us wrong.

If you think this is unfair, here is a list of the essential questions to consider – and to use your BBC-backed weight to obtain answers. We'll take a little wager that not one of these issues is seriously and sensibly addressed in the course of your film.

Why did the mainstream media including the BBC, choose not to question a single police report, political statement or any part of the official report? Is this now outside your remit? Is the BBC somehow under the impression that the police, the government and the intelligence agencies with their anonymous leaks are infallible and more importantly trustworthy? Given a verifiable history of deceit by all three, why would the BBC simply report as fact what these organisations claim?

Why won't the police release the enormous number of images and moving footage of the four bombers in London that they have claim to have and which must exist? Surely, with this much time passed, and in a serious documentary by the BBC there can be no harm in showing the moving CCTV footage of these four bombers - the footage which has condemned them, despite having never been seen by the british public?

How is that the police, intelligence agencies and media all falsely reported the time of the train the bombers took into London for over a year, given that the police has by its own statements, actual CCTV footage of the four bombers getting on this non-existent train?

Here`s a suggestion for a very interesting and enlightening sequence for your film.

Take a camera to Luton station, film the entire journey from there to the underground platforms that the bombers departed from (we were denied permission to do this, but we have a feeling the Beeb will be allowed) – time the journey and count the number of CCTV cameras that filmed the four alleged bombers along the way. Then calculate how many hours of footage of these men must exist if the official story of the mens journey to Kings Cross and onwards is true. Then reveal, perhaps with a crescendo of music – that not one single second of this footage has been presented. In fact, other than a still photo of Hussain outside boots, there is not one single frame of the four men in London. Does it exist? It must, if the official story is true. What possible reason could there be for not showing it?

What a scoop for the BBC it would be if they actually got this footage that has been denied from the British public! What a triumph to force the police into releasing the hours of moving images of the four suspects! And if they don't give you this footage straight away, what a wonderful opportunity to try and uncover why they won't! Exciting journalistic opportunities await, if you want to take the leap. Sadly, this won't happen, but again please – feel free to prove us wrong.

Yours sincerely

LD


This is an unparalleled response from the two sanest and most reliable sources of information about the flaws in the Official Narrative of 7/7. For too long, producers of mainstream media bullshit have taken it for granted that people who question the word of the proven liars in our governments will drop their pants at the slightest opportunity to get access to mainstream media - however biased, insulting and outright dishonest that coverage might be


At last, it seems that some people finally understand the nature of the struggle in which they are engaged

Absolutely brilliant, kudos all round


-

PS and whilst on the subject of how the whores at the BBC treat 'conspiracy folk', this comment over at the J7 Forum, made in response to J7T's statement of its rejection of the BBC Conspiracy Files, is worth a peek...


"My brother, Richard Chang who was a senior risk analyst at Abbey National, headquarters, London died after a fall on 13th July 2004 shortly after an interrogation by Kroll associates. The circumstances of his death are highly suspicious. Guy Smith producer of the propaganda film 9/11 BBC Conspiracy files whom I met personally offered to produce a documentary BEFORE the Coroner's Inquest only if the family publically stated that Richard committed suicide and on condition we did not talk to any other journalist. We declined on the grounds that we did not believe this to be true. After the Coroner's Inquest ruled a verdict of suicide I spoke to Guy again about making a documentary to which he responded that he was not interested because it was too late."

.

17 comments:

paul said...

I wonder who will turn up on this hard hitting investigation? The only conspiracies left seem to the 4th bomb bloke, the canvey-israeli monarch and, of course, the state version. All of them of them easy meat for the mighty BBC truthseeker, I'm sure.
Happy new year by the way, many more to you

Stef said...

Happy new year by the way, many more to you

likewise

Stef said...

I wonder who will turn up on this hard hitting investigation? The only conspiracies left seem to the 4th bomb bloke, the canvey-israeli monarch and, of course, the state version

Even Lord Muad'dib seems be joining in the The BBC Can Fuck Right Off party and the producers do indeed seem to be becoming a tad desperate

As one charter member of J7T said today...

My friend's boyfriend's brother's girlfriend's dad was quite interested in the events of July 7th 2005. I was amusing myself thinking of him getting an email perhaps next week from an increasingly desperate BBC trying to pad out their 7/7 CF programme content

Marvy...

Stef said...

There's an amusing little PS at the end of one of those links I posted in the previous comment...

In November of 2005, I presented The 9/11 – 7/7 Connection at The Trades Club in Hebdon Bridge, Yorkshire. At the end of the evening a gentleman approached me and introduced himself as a Senior Reporter with the Yorkshire Evening Post (I still have his Business Card). He proceeded to tell me that his own investigation also concluded that he doubted the veracity of the official version of events. I asked him if he would be publishing the results of his investigation. He hung his head and said, “Ian, as much as I would really like to (run the feature), … my Editor has told me that it would be journalistic suicide.”

Somehow I doubt that either you or the BBC are about to commit ‘journalistic suicide’!

paul said...

It would be professional, not journalistic, suicide.
I don't remember much investigation in the few bits of the c files I saw, just a well balanced assortment of loons and sensible folk.

Anonymous said...

Stef

This is incredible. Sefton Dalmer would be rolling in his grave ... but then, he didn't have the internet to contend with.

Bear in mind that they hung Haw-Haw after quite a convoluted proof of nationality.

Refusing to the put forward an alternative competing hypothesis is just so, so, clever. Well done J7; you've got well and truly inside the BBC's OODA loop. Every move they make just leads to more destruction of their credibility in the eyes of more and more people. The longer it goes on the more feeble and irrelevant they appear.

Stef said...

OODA!! Oorah!!

Merkin said...

After following the links, I am sorry to say that my poster of Tom Cruise received collateral damage in a major way.
Plus, I woke my mother from her drug induced Nirvana by my compulsion to sing 'Peter Hain and all the rest, fuck The Graun and the PPF'
.
What is the world cumming to?

Shahid said...

Following your lead, I'm posting a link to my post on this subject: http://www.suspectpaki.com/2008/01/15/snowball/

You were very quick off the mark on this one!

Signed,

King Paki

Shahid said...

Fuck me does the Beeb stink of shit!

Shahid said...

By the way, the last captcha I was asked to enter was "ijewpup" I kid you not.

Stef said...

= explanation of that King Paki line for the sake of posterity

Stef said...

= explanation of that 'ijewpup' line for the sake of posterity

Shahid said...

ROFL!!!!!!!

Shutter said...

Just a single line of enquiry would be worth the BBC truthseekers following up ... quite how did the X ray (?) of the nail bomb (?)"found" in the boot of a (?) car in Luton Railway Station , get taken , when , by whom , where and how did it find it's way to abc in the US whose copyright appears on syndicated repros of it ?

http://tinyurl.com/3xjehe

... even in that wonderfully independent minded newspaper the ...er .. Independent.

"The Independent wonders whether the car was a bomb store for another team of bombers."

http://tinyurl.com/2mslk6

I only ask.

PS : really pissed off, I haven't been asked to partake in the BEEB'S LIES - bang goes my credibility.

Stef said...

PS : really pissed off, I haven't been asked to partake in the BEEB'S LIES - bang goes my credibility.

You're not the only one :(

Stef said...

Maybe it's something we said