Gosh, that is a tough question. It's a conundrum wrapped up in an enigma...
.
Stef's Blog - a native London Southlander and unrepentant 'Conspiraloon™' who doesn't trust anyone, not even himself. Sometimes I take pictures. I also enjoy swearing immensely and think much faster than I can type, so each post comes guaranteed to include at last one confusing typo. OK?
Add your candidate(s) here
We can beat this - TOGETHER!
Thanks to the Conspiraloon Laboratories, you can now Ruin Those You Resent without leaving your personal computer!
10 comments:
all the others were undercover police?
Congratulations Paul
A complimentary case of champagne and a pair of size 9 issue boots are winging their way to you as I type
And how did 11 people create such a lot of publicity? It truly is a miracle. Some marketing agency ought to sign them up, right now...
"protesters in Fortnum and Masons are charged with causing £1,500 quids worth of damage - someone knocked over a jar of olives"
Birgitta has just made a couple of interesting posts, one before the referendum where she posts a Michael Hudson email. The second explaining her no decision.
a pair of size 9 issue boots
Jesus, they're just getting smaller and smaller! In my day, no self-respecting copper would wear anything under a Clarks-issue 12!
Fascinating report from Mindhacks,
"Bin Laden used a woman as a human shield and fired at the commando team sent to kill him – at least according to the first reports. These have just been corrected to say he was unarmed and standing alone, but the retractions follow a useful pattern – media friendly version first, accurate version later – because the updates make little impact on our beliefs.
....
More recent studies have supported the remarkable power of first strike news. The emotional impact of the first version has little influence on its power to persuade after correction, and the misinformation still has an effect even when it is remembered more poorly than the retraction."
http://mindhacks.com/2011/05/04/why-the-truth-will-out-but-doesnt-sink-in/
At 4pm on Thursday 12th May at Southwark Crown Court the jury returned and declared Muad’Dib (Anthony John Hill) innocent of attempting to ‘pervert the course of justice’.
Mr. Hill has spent 151 days incarcerated in Wandsworth prison over the past few months and this verdict spared him, mercifully, a sentence of up to 20 years in jail.
His offence? He had sent six DVD copies of his film ‘7/7: The Ripple Effect’ to various persons at the time (in 2008) of the trial in Kingston of three ‘terror’ suspects, alleged co-conspirators with the London ‘suicide bombers’. The DVD’s were intercepted and never reached their targets. The Kingston suspects were found innocent (only to later be retried for the same offences, but that’s another story).
anon
You appear to be mistaking my blog as being somewhere that isn't up to speed with Muad'dib's antics
I am fully aware of what the old charlatan did in the way of trying to interfere with a court case and it's not as simple as you pretend.
He stuck his nose into a court case without the consent of the accused or their representatives
His subsequent court appearances have coincided with key points in the 7/7 Inquest and I had no doubt he would be let off once he had served his usefulness with the conclusion of the 7/7 Inquest a few days before acquittal
...but hats off to the old goat. He makes public appearances dressed as an Israeli flag, claims to be the King of Israel, puts out disinfo shit which smears honest, objective 7/7 research and his followers and hangers-on still think anyone who criticises him is a Mossad agent
Truly His powers are awesome
Post a Comment