tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8225855.post3717197861995296509..comments2023-10-18T16:25:13.593+01:00Comments on Famous for 15 megapixels: Going, going... not goneStefhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01467757421113856218noreply@blogger.comBlogger16125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8225855.post-25014432880292412642008-07-22T14:24:00.000+01:002008-07-22T14:24:00.000+01:00Shameless - Brown at the Knesset<A HREF="http://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2008/07/shameless.html" REL="nofollow"><I>Shameless - Brown at the Knesset</I></A>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8225855.post-55047427217780806792008-07-22T11:09:00.000+01:002008-07-22T11:09:00.000+01:00I meant to say " ... a *floor* colapsing ..."I meant to say " ... a *floor* colapsing ..."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8225855.post-67154931908464327782008-07-22T09:38:00.000+01:002008-07-22T09:38:00.000+01:00At 1:04 you can see a building collapsing:http://w...At 1:04 you can see a building collapsing:<BR/>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-8FkFSa0HWAAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8225855.post-5817559809656174662008-07-22T03:49:00.000+01:002008-07-22T03:49:00.000+01:00there's a lot of it aboutthere's a lot of it aboutAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8225855.post-78770395482298554222008-07-22T03:00:00.000+01:002008-07-22T03:00:00.000+01:00Gordon of course took the opportunity whilst in ma...Gordon of course took the opportunity whilst in manchester to address the Labour Friends of Israel where he let those words slip.<BR/><BR/>Charmless Mr Purnell ( A Manchester MP and wannabe PM) who wants you to go back to work, was Chairman and is very active with Labour FOI.<BR/><BR/>Boris and David C have both gone on record saying thet are Zionists.<BR/><BR/>Not forgetting that the Chief Rabbi's daughter Gilda Sacks works in Gordon's office.zizhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15249645812407323273noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8225855.post-30744086727050464352008-07-21T22:54:00.000+01:002008-07-21T22:54:00.000+01:00You learn somethin' every day - except when you do...<I>You learn somethin' every day - except when you don't. Like Gordon has always been a great supporter of Israel</I><BR/><BR/>not that new...<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://www.thejc.com/home.aspx?ParentId=m11&SecId=11&AId=54262&ATypeId=1" REL="nofollow"><I>In a speech to Labour Friends of Israel in April, he recounted how his late father, a Church of Scotland minister, had taught him about “the trials and tribulations of the Jewish people, about the enormous suffering and loss during the Holocaust, as well as the extraordinary struggle he described to me of people to create <B>this magnificent homeland</B>”</I></A>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8225855.post-36977187393107548212008-07-21T22:44:00.000+01:002008-07-21T22:44:00.000+01:00"telepathically fluidised " .... that must explain..."telepathically fluidised " .... that must explain the "wobbly" bridge across the Thames... all that fluid underneath.<BR/><BR/>You learn somethin' every day - except when you don't.<BR/><BR/>Like Gordon has always been a great supporter of Israel. Can he ditto that re United Kingdom ?<BR/><BR/>Might send him an FOI request.zizhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15249645812407323273noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8225855.post-21082752489182617162008-07-21T21:10:00.000+01:002008-07-21T21:10:00.000+01:00ah, but that's because of the telepathic simultane...ah, but that's because of the telepathic simultaneous fluidisation of the entire structure due to fire, as so thoroughly explained by the BBC, I refer to aboveStefhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01467757421113856218noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8225855.post-11400646473444215282008-07-21T20:48:00.000+01:002008-07-21T20:48:00.000+01:00This video, while providing an entertaining "Nelso...This video, while providing an entertaining "Nelson Muntz Ha ha!" moment, does not prove anything about the WTC. Sorry boys.<BR/><BR/>That´s how the Twin Towers SHOULD have collapsed if the planes and fires had caused the "pancake" collapse.The towers would have toppled and crumbled in a slower and clumsy manner instead they exploded like a fuckin Roman candle fire work speeded up!<BR/><BR/><BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IX9gdRST6zM&feature=related" REL="nofollow">Roman candle</A>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8225855.post-69171971648106000422008-07-21T20:17:00.000+01:002008-07-21T20:17:00.000+01:00no, it doesn't prove anythingthe building (not) be...no, it doesn't prove anything<BR/><BR/>the building (not) being imploded is <A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zip_Feed_Tower" REL="nofollow">grain elevator</A> and those things are built like bunkers<BR/><BR/>funny though...Stefhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01467757421113856218noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8225855.post-67280837238149989772008-07-21T20:03:00.001+01:002008-07-21T20:03:00.001+01:00This video, while providing an entertaining "Nelso...This video, while providing an entertaining "Nelson Muntz Ha ha!" moment, does not prove anything about the WTC. Sorry boys.<BR/><BR/>Did you notice many windows on this building? No? This thing is/was basicly a bunker. And the problem is, if people who pull (i think this is the correct terminus) "normal" buildings totally underestimate what it takes to take down such a building. (I have seen it with a similar building. I have photos, alas not digital ones) You can not compare this concrete bunker with the WTC building. And if it proves anything, then it is that people working in the controlled demolition sector underestimate what it takes to take down a building.<BR/><BR/>None the less, your point that if a (random) plane hit and a (random) fire could take down the WTC towers, a (controlled) demolition should not be too difficult.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8225855.post-38415893934078838702008-07-21T20:03:00.000+01:002008-07-21T20:03:00.000+01:00Yeah, I saw this and the first thing I thought was...Yeah, I saw this and the first thing I thought was "I can't see any planes, surely you need planes to bring a building down like that"<BR/><BR/>And I realised I had become the worst of Conspiraloons - a no-planer. Well, it's a no-brainer.Shahidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14555080365070123707noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8225855.post-28029295309292263182008-07-21T19:44:00.000+01:002008-07-21T19:44:00.000+01:00Meanwhile, in Scotland..."BBC: Tower blocks demoli...Meanwhile, in Scotland...<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/glasgow_and_west/7516267.stm" REL="nofollow">"BBC: Tower blocks demolished in blast"</A><BR/><BR/><I>"Two multi-storey tower blocks in Glasgow were reduced to 16,000 tons of rubble in just eight seconds during a controlled explosion..."</I><BR/><BR/><I>"...Teams of experts have been working for <B>nine months</B> preparing the flats, built in 1967, for Sunday's demolition."</I><BR/><BR/>as they say, it's only subliminal if you don't noticeStefhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01467757421113856218noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8225855.post-8148873487725413992008-07-21T18:25:00.000+01:002008-07-21T18:25:00.000+01:00^ Yes, that seems to be a very plausible explanati...^ Yes, that seems to be a very plausible explanation. <BR/><BR/>One can only wonder why people bother studying the demolition of buildings with very dangerous explosive substances when a few <A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov_cocktail" REL="nofollow">molotov cocktails</A> lobbed through some windows would achieve precisely the same thing.The Antagonisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01459201402366077472noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8225855.post-54644670224546383382008-07-21T16:57:00.000+01:002008-07-21T16:57:00.000+01:00equipped with a rudimentary working knowledge of c...equipped with a rudimentary working knowledge of counter-intuitive engineering techniques, courtesy of the BBC, it's so obvious what the people who tried knocking down that building <I>should</I> have done<BR/><BR/>to ensure a nicely symmetrical drop they should have first chipped away at one corner of the building with a couple of bulldozers and then set fire to some office equipment at random locations on three or four floors of the building<BR/><BR/>...four or five hours later and, bingo, every part of the structure would have telepathically fluidised all at the same timeStefhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01467757421113856218noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8225855.post-68205696764143034352008-07-21T16:06:00.000+01:002008-07-21T16:06:00.000+01:00yes,takes a lot of skill to bring down a building ...yes,<BR/><BR/>takes a lot of skill to bring down a building successfully!!!<BR/><BR/>http://911review.org/Wget/www.nerdcities.com/guardian/wtc/wtc-demolition.htm<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://911review.org/Wget/www.nerdcities.com/guardian/wtc/wtc-demolition.htm" REL="nofollow">911 was an inside job</A>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com