tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8225855.post2222562300233440815..comments2023-10-18T16:25:13.593+01:00Comments on Famous for 15 megapixels: Shitipedia - ReduxStefhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01467757421113856218noreply@blogger.comBlogger14125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8225855.post-79459051441343117652007-10-09T00:20:00.000+01:002007-10-09T00:20:00.000+01:00Wikipedia is complete cock.I tried to edit the ent...Wikipedia is complete cock.<BR/><BR/>I tried to edit the entry for the charlatan founder of a Punjabi messianic cult at the periphery of Islam that I was ignorantly part of - you know the one - Mirza Ghulam Ahmad.<BR/><BR/>I was honest, impartial, met all the wonkypedia guidelines in fact, but my edits were repeatedly trashed by the prick who gatekeeps the entry.<BR/><BR/>I realised that the same must be true of much of the tosh on there, so now I wonder who is actually running this 21st Century incarnation of MiniTrue....after all...search on just about anybody who was anybody and the first entry that comes up is wackypissiaShahidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14555080365070123707noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8225855.post-37473129855283690712007-10-08T23:00:00.000+01:002007-10-08T23:00:00.000+01:00That is normal when so many people get together......<A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Lamest_edit_wars_ever" REL="nofollow">That</A> is normal when so many people get together...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8225855.post-53321006699794432282007-10-08T16:23:00.000+01:002007-10-08T16:23:00.000+01:00Criticism of wikipedia misses the point. Wikipedi...Criticism of wikipedia misses the point. Wikipedia has arisen because of a knowledge vacuum. Unless one has an Athens account, access to information that comprises our common knowledge base is effectively (in both senses of the word) prohibited. This is particularly wrong since we are the beneficial owners of the knowledge.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8225855.post-28802994271837399132007-10-08T13:54:00.000+01:002007-10-08T13:54:00.000+01:00VOX(fux) NYC used to have a wikipage. I saw it abo...VOX(fux) NYC used to have a wikipage. I saw it about a year ago. At the time, there was a warning there that it was in danger of deletion for what I'm pretty sure was "lack of relevence"<BR/><BR/>Yeah., I mean who cares about all this Bush cocaine pedophillia assassinations / Zionist cabal running most of the mindsets on the planet. Relevance huh.<BR/><BR/>P.S. Steve Watson (Prisonplanet fame) reported about a month or so ago about some dude fishing for 9-11 related wiki content and this dude deleted of edited them.<BR/><BR/>Sadly I haven;t the time to do wiki pages especially as they will come under attack. Best to stick to good sites like J7, the ant, our blogs and other actual news sites, where we have the maximum chance of mainitaining editorial control.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8225855.post-6562582873410414832007-10-08T13:32:00.000+01:002007-10-08T13:32:00.000+01:00It was in the months after 9-11 atrocity and the a...It was in the months after 9-11 atrocity and the anthrax attacks, that an excellent lady friend passed me the link to voxfux's "STRANGER THAN FICTION"<BR/>- AN INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION OF 9-11 AND THE WAR ON TERRORISM<BR/>By: Dr. Albert D. Pastore Phd, and helped my thin smokescreen finally disperse.<BR/><BR/>See the right hand pane of http://www.voxfux.com/<BR/><BR/>That was a pioneer of 9-11 'truth' reports, and still a classic, even after 5 years. The anthrax attacks were covered in that essay, (middle) fingering Zack and it was almost an exclusive!<BR/><BR/>Vox has another story right at the botton of his front page...<BR/>http://tinyurl.com/35m8k7 which has at its centre, the person they tried to frame; Dr. Steven Hatfill to let Zack get away with it.<BR/><BR/>Hatfill has benefited from this seemingly false anthrax accusation to the point where his rotten work as been overshadowed. Give this a read and you'll find Hatfill is no angel either.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8225855.post-12755455364291877592007-10-08T00:03:00.001+01:002007-10-08T00:03:00.001+01:00ou might find the Wayback Server useful to trace t...ou might find the <A HREF="http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page" REL="nofollow">Wayback Server</A> useful to trace that deleted article:Rory Winterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05576969819210177312noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8225855.post-56656916898363735962007-10-08T00:03:00.000+01:002007-10-08T00:03:00.000+01:00@antThe Henry Jackson Society does have an undelet...@ant<BR/><BR/>The Henry Jackson Society does have an undeleted Wikipedia entry so it must be really important<BR/><BR/>...and colossi of humanitarian thought and Universal Love such as Michael Gove, Denis MacShane, Richard Perle and William Kristol endorse it so it can't be insane at all<BR/><BR/>@rw<BR/><BR/>I haven't<BR/><BR/>taStefhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01467757421113856218noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8225855.post-473934414067146102007-10-07T23:57:00.000+01:002007-10-07T23:57:00.000+01:00Stef, if you haven't seen it already, read thisby ...Stef, if you haven't seen it already, <A HREF="http://kurtnimmo.com/?p=958" REL="nofollow">read this</A>by Kurt NimmoRory Winterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05576969819210177312noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8225855.post-26462739218006654462007-10-07T23:39:00.000+01:002007-10-07T23:39:00.000+01:00Sorry to piss on the Common Purpose parade, but I'...Sorry to piss on the Common Purpose parade, but I'll see your 'Common Purpose' and raise you a '<A HREF="http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,,1644298,00.html" REL="nofollow">new commentariat</A>' laden <A HREF="http://www.henryjacksonsociety.org/" REL="nofollow">Henry Jackson Society</A>.The Antagonisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01459201402366077472noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8225855.post-83942196557609074342007-10-07T23:08:00.000+01:002007-10-07T23:08:00.000+01:00it's not just youit's not just youStefhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01467757421113856218noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8225855.post-3847119777090360652007-10-07T23:04:00.000+01:002007-10-07T23:04:00.000+01:00@brendadadaunfortunately, i've read of many exampl...@brendadada<BR/><BR/>unfortunately, i've read of many examples of good, cited work being added to wikipedia, only to be deleted shortly thereafter for no apparent reason.<BR/><BR/>this being the internet, i should be able to link to some examples, but i didn't bother bookmarking any of it. but it certainly is a common story, at least from what i've seen.<BR/><BR/>one example that does come to mind is a 911 researcher who made a significant, very coherent and <I>extremely</I> well cited contribution to the osama bin laden video tapes article, only to have the changes deleted without reason.<BR/><BR/>i just spent 20 minutes looking for that story and couldn't find it. in theory it should be in the history of the wiki entry, but i've wasted enough time as it is.<BR/><BR/>is it just me, or is google search significantly more useless than it used to be?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8225855.post-74859019657595923132007-10-07T21:25:00.000+01:002007-10-07T21:25:00.000+01:00@bFrom what I've seen, a coherent argument from a ...@b<BR/><BR/><I>From what I've seen, a coherent argument from a contributor always gets stuff kept</I><BR/><BR/>...kicking myself for not getting on the case sooner<BR/><BR/>@anon<BR/><BR/>DMdR is trying to save the Planet because he loves us all and must be protected from snarky comments at all costs<BR/><BR/>particularly on a site someone from his extended family could conceivably have helped pay forStefhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01467757421113856218noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8225855.post-58386336345664206432007-10-07T21:17:00.000+01:002007-10-07T21:17:00.000+01:00I tried editing David de Rothschild's page the oth...I tried editing David de Rothschild's page the other day but the moderators didn't appear to like my changes - I can't think why!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8225855.post-51155448542953710702007-10-07T20:34:00.000+01:002007-10-07T20:34:00.000+01:00Funny, I was thinking the other day hpw good it wo...Funny, I was thinking the other day hpw good it would be if all you Conspiraloon pros were to get in there and start seriously writing Wikipedia.<BR/><BR/>They only save articles which are properly referenced in the real world. I'm certain you lot could do that. Well actually, just one of you would do a very effective job.<BR/><BR/>Just the other day I found that 'Polaroid Type 55' is now an orphaned page on Wikipedia, which is damnable, really, but I don't have time at the mome nt to do the linkeages.<BR/><BR/>But near-obsolete film formats are not quite such serious matters.<BR/><BR/>From what I've seen, a coherent argument from a contributor always gets stuff kept, fsvo 'always', obv.<BR/><BR/>Go on, I know you want to..!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com